Review



virus expressing chr2  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc virus expressing chr2
    ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 <t>(ChR2)</t> to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.
    Virus Expressing Chr2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 41 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/virus expressing chr2/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 41 article reviews
    virus expressing chr2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex"

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    Journal: eLife

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.

    Techniques Used: Injection, Labeling, Transferring, Staining, Fluorescence

    ( A ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) traces from individual neurons (data from L2/3 looped intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Each trace corresponds to the average excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in the location eliciting the largest amplitude. Blue tick, laser pulse. The arrowhead indicates a single neuron (trace in blue) in which the laser pulse evoked an early-onset EPSC, suggestive of a non-synaptic response. Ten neurons with early-onset EPSCs were detected in the entire dataset and removed from further analysis. ( B ) Anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) immunostained section of primary visual cortex (V1) showing fluorescent medial visual area (V2M) axons in an animal injected with AAV2/1-CAG-ChR2-Venus. ( C ) Higher magnification image of a region in ( B ). The arrow indicates an example of a retrogradely infected neuron in V1. ( D ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2M feedback (FB) input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1 using AAV5-CaMKIIa-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP. ( E ) sCRACM traces from 11 looped IT neurons recorded in L6 from the experiment in ( D ). ( F ) Left, paired comparisons of total FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons from the experiment in ( D ). Inset traces represent group averages for each projection class. Blue tick, light pulse. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. *, p=0.0116.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) traces from individual neurons (data from L2/3 looped intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Each trace corresponds to the average excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in the location eliciting the largest amplitude. Blue tick, laser pulse. The arrowhead indicates a single neuron (trace in blue) in which the laser pulse evoked an early-onset EPSC, suggestive of a non-synaptic response. Ten neurons with early-onset EPSCs were detected in the entire dataset and removed from further analysis. ( B ) Anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) immunostained section of primary visual cortex (V1) showing fluorescent medial visual area (V2M) axons in an animal injected with AAV2/1-CAG-ChR2-Venus. ( C ) Higher magnification image of a region in ( B ). The arrow indicates an example of a retrogradely infected neuron in V1. ( D ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2M feedback (FB) input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1 using AAV5-CaMKIIa-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP. ( E ) sCRACM traces from 11 looped IT neurons recorded in L6 from the experiment in ( D ). ( F ) Left, paired comparisons of total FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons from the experiment in ( D ). Inset traces represent group averages for each projection class. Blue tick, light pulse. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. *, p=0.0116.

    Techniques Used: Injection, Infection

    ( A ) Total subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedforward (FF) projections. Circles, individual cells. Triangles, mean values per projection class for each experiment. Averages from paired data are joined by a line. Color indicates projection class. ( B ) Total sCRACM input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedback (FB) projections.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Total subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedforward (FF) projections. Circles, individual cells. Triangles, mean values per projection class for each experiment. Averages from paired data are joined by a line. Color indicates projection class. ( B ) Total sCRACM input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedback (FB) projections.

    Techniques Used:

    ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by pia position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of input strength. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by pia position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of input strength. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Techniques Used:

    ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by soma position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of the mean distribution of inputs as a function of distance to soma. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of soma-aligned sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by soma position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of the mean distribution of inputs as a function of distance to soma. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of soma-aligned sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Techniques Used:

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons (n, number of cell pairs; N, number of mice); black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Colors correspond to ( A ). Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 7, N = 6; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 6). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 5, N = 5) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 5, N = 5; V2M→V1, n = 4, N = 4) of apical FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 8, N = 7) of apical FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons (n, number of cell pairs; N, number of mice); black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Colors correspond to ( A ). Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 7, N = 6; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 6). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 5, N = 5) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 5, N = 5; V2M→V1, n = 4, N = 4) of apical FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 8, N = 7) of apical FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons.

    Techniques Used: Generated

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual (V2L) or medial visual (V2M) areas. ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 12, N = 8; V1→V2M, n = 11, N = 7). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 11, N = 7) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 11, N = 10) of FB input in L1 to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 12, N = 9) of FB input in L1 to looped IT vs. PT neurons.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual (V2L) or medial visual (V2M) areas. ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 12, N = 8; V1→V2M, n = 11, N = 7). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 11, N = 7) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 11, N = 10) of FB input in L1 to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 12, N = 9) of FB input in L1 to looped IT vs. PT neurons.

    Techniques Used: Generated

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped intratelencephalic (IT) neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for inputs in L1 (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 11, N = 7; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 5). ( E ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( H ) Same as G for inputs in L1 (SRI: V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 12, N = 11).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped intratelencephalic (IT) neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for inputs in L1 (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 11, N = 7; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 5). ( E ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( H ) Same as G for inputs in L1 (SRI: V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 12, N = 11).

    Techniques Used: Generated


    Figure Legend Snippet:

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation, Software



    Similar Products

    93
    Addgene inc virus expressing chr2
    ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 <t>(ChR2)</t> to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.
    Virus Expressing Chr2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/virus expressing chr2/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    virus expressing chr2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc chr2 venus expression
    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing <t>ChR2-Venus</t> expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.
    Chr2 Venus Expression, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/chr2 venus expression/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    chr2 venus expression - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    BioResource International Inc transgenic rats expressing chr2-venus under the control of thy1.2 promoter in the nervous system
    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing <t>ChR2-Venus</t> expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.
    Transgenic Rats Expressing Chr2 Venus Under The Control Of Thy1.2 Promoter In The Nervous System, supplied by BioResource International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/transgenic rats expressing chr2-venus under the control of thy1.2 promoter in the nervous system/product/BioResource International Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    transgenic rats expressing chr2-venus under the control of thy1.2 promoter in the nervous system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc recombinant rabies virus carrying a channelrhodopsin-2-venus expression construct (rrabies-chr2-vn)
    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing <t>ChR2-Venus</t> expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.
    Recombinant Rabies Virus Carrying A Channelrhodopsin 2 Venus Expression Construct (Rrabies Chr2 Vn), supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant rabies virus carrying a channelrhodopsin-2-venus expression construct (rrabies-chr2-vn)/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant rabies virus carrying a channelrhodopsin-2-venus expression construct (rrabies-chr2-vn) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc chr2 venus expression construct
    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing <t>ChR2-Venus</t> expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.
    Chr2 Venus Expression Construct, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/chr2 venus expression construct/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    chr2 venus expression construct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc adeno-associated virus carrying a chr2-venus expression construct (aav2/9-chr2-vn)
    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing <t>ChR2-Venus</t> expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.
    Adeno Associated Virus Carrying A Chr2 Venus Expression Construct (Aav2/9 Chr2 Vn), supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/adeno-associated virus carrying a chr2-venus expression construct (aav2/9-chr2-vn)/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    adeno-associated virus carrying a chr2-venus expression construct (aav2/9-chr2-vn) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) We probed the strength of CC inputs to looped and non-looped neurons in different cortical layers. ( B ) Example experiment configuration. Retrograde tracers are injected in two areas to label different projection neurons. One cortical area is also co-injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to express ChR2 in a specific CC projection. ( C ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) experiment. Pairs of neighboring retrogradely labeled neurons in the same cortical layer were sequentially recorded. During each recording, a laser beam was scanned over the dendrites of the cell at different locations in a grid pattern. ( D ) Brightfield image of an acute coronal cortical slice showing the recording pipette and photostimulation grid. ( E ) Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from a pair of neighboring L5 neurons, evoked by photostimulating ChR2 + V2L→V1 FB terminals on a grid. ( F ) Left, dendritic morphology staining of the recorded pair. Right, identity of the recorded projection neuron was confirmed by fluorescence in the soma of both a retrograde tracer and a different-colored dye introduced from the internal patch pipette solution. ( G ) sCRACM maps of the recorded pair overlaid on their reconstructed dendrites. Responsive locations are color-coded to represent mean amplitude.

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Injection, Labeling, Transferring, Staining, Fluorescence

    ( A ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) traces from individual neurons (data from L2/3 looped intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Each trace corresponds to the average excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in the location eliciting the largest amplitude. Blue tick, laser pulse. The arrowhead indicates a single neuron (trace in blue) in which the laser pulse evoked an early-onset EPSC, suggestive of a non-synaptic response. Ten neurons with early-onset EPSCs were detected in the entire dataset and removed from further analysis. ( B ) Anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) immunostained section of primary visual cortex (V1) showing fluorescent medial visual area (V2M) axons in an animal injected with AAV2/1-CAG-ChR2-Venus. ( C ) Higher magnification image of a region in ( B ). The arrow indicates an example of a retrogradely infected neuron in V1. ( D ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2M feedback (FB) input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1 using AAV5-CaMKIIa-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP. ( E ) sCRACM traces from 11 looped IT neurons recorded in L6 from the experiment in ( D ). ( F ) Left, paired comparisons of total FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons from the experiment in ( D ). Inset traces represent group averages for each projection class. Blue tick, light pulse. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. *, p=0.0116.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Example of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) traces from individual neurons (data from L2/3 looped intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Each trace corresponds to the average excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in the location eliciting the largest amplitude. Blue tick, laser pulse. The arrowhead indicates a single neuron (trace in blue) in which the laser pulse evoked an early-onset EPSC, suggestive of a non-synaptic response. Ten neurons with early-onset EPSCs were detected in the entire dataset and removed from further analysis. ( B ) Anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) immunostained section of primary visual cortex (V1) showing fluorescent medial visual area (V2M) axons in an animal injected with AAV2/1-CAG-ChR2-Venus. ( C ) Higher magnification image of a region in ( B ). The arrow indicates an example of a retrogradely infected neuron in V1. ( D ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2M feedback (FB) input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1 using AAV5-CaMKIIa-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP. ( E ) sCRACM traces from 11 looped IT neurons recorded in L6 from the experiment in ( D ). ( F ) Left, paired comparisons of total FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons from the experiment in ( D ). Inset traces represent group averages for each projection class. Blue tick, light pulse. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. *, p=0.0116.

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Injection, Infection

    ( A ) Total subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedforward (FF) projections. Circles, individual cells. Triangles, mean values per projection class for each experiment. Averages from paired data are joined by a line. Color indicates projection class. ( B ) Total sCRACM input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedback (FB) projections.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Total subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedforward (FF) projections. Circles, individual cells. Triangles, mean values per projection class for each experiment. Averages from paired data are joined by a line. Color indicates projection class. ( B ) Total sCRACM input per neuron as a function of cortical depth for both feedback (FB) projections.

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques:

    ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by pia position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of input strength. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by pia position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of input strength. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques:

    ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by soma position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of the mean distribution of inputs as a function of distance to soma. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of soma-aligned sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Left, group averages of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps aligned by soma position showing primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to the different cell types (combining V1→V2L and V1→V2M inputs in the case of intratelencephalic [IT] neurons). Triangles, soma position. Right, vertical profiles of the mean distribution of inputs as a function of distance to soma. Error bars, s.e.m.; n, number of neurons; N, number of mice. ( B ) Group averages and vertical profiles of soma-aligned sCRACM maps showing FB input to the different cell types in V1 (combining V2L→V1 and V2M→V1 inputs in the case of IT neurons).

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques:

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons (n, number of cell pairs; N, number of mice); black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Colors correspond to ( A ). Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 7, N = 6; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 6). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 5, N = 5) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 5, N = 5; V2M→V1, n = 4, N = 4) of apical FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 8, N = 7) of apical FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons (n, number of cell pairs; N, number of mice); black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Colors correspond to ( A ). Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 7, N = 6; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 6). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 5, N = 5) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L6 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 5, N = 5; V2M→V1, n = 4, N = 4) of apical FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L6 looped IT and CT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent CT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 8, N = 7) of apical FB input to looped IT vs. CT neurons.

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Generated

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual (V2L) or medial visual (V2M) areas. ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 12, N = 8; V1→V2M, n = 11, N = 7). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 11, N = 7) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 11, N = 10) of FB input in L1 to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 12, N = 9) of FB input in L1 to looped IT vs. PT neurons.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in lateral visual (V2L) or medial visual (V2M) areas. ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for apical inputs (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 12, N = 8; V1→V2M, n = 11, N = 7). ( E ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V1 FF input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V2L. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( H ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 11, N = 7) of apical FF input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( I ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L5 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( J ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( K ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( L ) Paired comparisons and SRI (V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 11, N = 10) of FB input in L1 to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. ( M ) Configuration of experiment comparing strength of V2L FB input to pairs of L5 looped IT and PT neurons in V1. ( N ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent PT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( O ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped IT vs. PT neurons. ( P ) Paired comparisons and SRI (n = 12, N = 9) of FB input in L1 to looped IT vs. PT neurons.

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Generated

    ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped intratelencephalic (IT) neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for inputs in L1 (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 11, N = 7; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 5). ( E ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( H ) Same as G for inputs in L1 (SRI: V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 12, N = 11).

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of primary visual cortex (V1) FF input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped intratelencephalic (IT) neurons in lateral visual area (V2L) or medial visual area (V2M). ( B ) Example pair of subcellular channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted circuit mapping (sCRACM) maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V1 FF inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V2L. ( C ) Left, paired comparisons of perisomatic FF input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons; black dots, V1→V2L inputs; gray dots, V1→V2M inputs. Traces were generated by averaging the mean perisomatic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of each neuron across all neurons in the same projection class. Blue tick, laser pulse. Scale bars in all panels, 2 pA and 20 ms. Right, sCRACM Response Index (SRI) of the same data. Number of cell pairs and animals are the same as in the left plot unless otherwise specified. Horizontal line, mean. *, p<0.05, see text for exact value. ( D ) Same as C for inputs in L1 (SRI: V1→V2L, n = 11, N = 7; V1→V2M, n = 7, N = 5). ( E ) Configuration of experiments comparing strength of V2L or V2M FB input to pairs of L2/3 looped and non-looped IT neurons in V1. ( F ) Example pair of sCRACM maps overlaid on reconstructed dendrites showing monosynaptic V2L FB inputs to a looped IT neuron (left) and an adjacent non-looped IT neuron (right) recorded in V1. ( G ) Paired comparisons and SRI of perisomatic FB input to looped vs. non-looped IT neurons. Dark green dots, V2L→V1 inputs; light green dots, V2M→V1 inputs. ( H ) Same as G for inputs in L1 (SRI: V2L→V1, n = 11, N = 10; V2M→V1, n = 12, N = 11).

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Generated

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.59551

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Virus expressing ChR2 (AAV-2/1-CAG-Channelrhodopsin-2-Venus, Addgene #20071; 20–25 nl, titer ~5×10 12 vg/ml) was delivered intracortically either to V1 to label FF projections or V2L/V2M to label FB projections, and co-injected with red-fluorescent microspheres (Red Retrobeads IX, Lumafluor; 10–12.5 nl) to retrogradely label cells projecting to the source of FF/FB input.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation, Software

    OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing ChR2-Venus expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Observing fear enables plasticity of the dmPFC-BLA pathway during subsequent learning of inhibitory avoidance

    doi: 10.1101/296681

    Figure Lengend Snippet: OF enables facilitation of the dmPFC-BLA pathway by IA training in free moving mice. (A) Schematics representing ChR2-Venus expressing dmPFC neurons projecting to BLA and bilaterally implanted optrodes. (B) Verification of optrode location. Left: visible light, right: Venus fluorescence images. Position of electrode tips marked as red stars. (C) (Upper) Examples of fEPSP traces before (a) and after (b) IA training (averaged over the time range shown by horizontal black bars) in an OF-experienced mouse (OF) and an OF control mouse (OF control). (Lower) fEPSP slopes and amplitudes normalized to the baseline for the same animals. (D) Summary fEPSP data. n=8 (OF), 7 (OF cont). Horizontal black bars indicate the time range corresponding to the averaged fEPSP data on the right. Vertical arrows indicate the time of IA training. Each data point represents the average during 6 min. Blue light pulses (3 mW, 0.5 ms duration) were given every 30 s. *p<0.05.

    Article Snippet: ChR2-AAV pseudo-type 1 virus at the titer of 10 12 viral particles/ml was prepared by University of North Carolina Gene Therapy Vector Core (Chapel Hill, NC) using Addgene plasmid 20071 , in which ChR2-Venus expression is driven by CAG promoter.

    Techniques: Expressing, Fluorescence